<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A story is a social object</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.story-review.com/2009/01/a-story-is-a-social-object/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.story-review.com/2009/01/a-story-is-a-social-object/</link>
	<description>There is more than one way to tell a story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:35:06 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dilyan Damyanov</title>
		<link>http://www.story-review.com/2009/01/a-story-is-a-social-object/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilyan Damyanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.story-review.com/?p=121#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Alison, thanks for your comment.

I think one of the reasons why many journalists are so reluctant to collaborate with their readers is because they feel only trained, professional journalists are entitled to doing journalistic work. This is, of course, bollocks, but obviously a pair you cannot easily kick.

I&#039;ve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.story-review.com/?p=54&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogged &lt;/a&gt; about this and there has been a very heated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joannageary.com/2008/10/28/quick-incoherent-thought-2-why-most-news-doesnt-need-journos/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;discussion &lt;/a&gt; on the topic over at www.joannageary.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alison, thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>I think one of the reasons why many journalists are so reluctant to collaborate with their readers is because they feel only trained, professional journalists are entitled to doing journalistic work. This is, of course, bollocks, but obviously a pair you cannot easily kick.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.story-review.com/?p=54" rel="nofollow">blogged </a> about this and there has been a very heated <a href="http://www.joannageary.com/2008/10/28/quick-incoherent-thought-2-why-most-news-doesnt-need-journos/" rel="nofollow">discussion </a> on the topic over at <a href="http://www.joannageary.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.joannageary.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Gow</title>
		<link>http://www.story-review.com/2009/01/a-story-is-a-social-object/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Gow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.story-review.com/?p=121#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Thought-provoking and essential reading, Dilyan and Mark. 
We journos don&#039;t think twice of asking our colleagues for help with an intro, advice on who best to contact, or for a phone number; yet we so often shy away from asking the wider world - a place where we would find so many more able collaborators for our story. 
This, despite the demonstrated wisdom that crowdsourcing is a successful and collaborative way of researching and spreading information.
Sending a story out into the world without its coat buttoned and shoes tied a really exciting idea, because it gives so many more people the opportunity to dress it up in their own ways. 
Things are changing, and it&#039;s great when you see &#039;Eureka&#039; moments happening in a newsroom. We just need to see more of them happening across all tiers of the editorial structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought-provoking and essential reading, Dilyan and Mark.<br />
We journos don&#8217;t think twice of asking our colleagues for help with an intro, advice on who best to contact, or for a phone number; yet we so often shy away from asking the wider world &#8211; a place where we would find so many more able collaborators for our story.<br />
This, despite the demonstrated wisdom that crowdsourcing is a successful and collaborative way of researching and spreading information.<br />
Sending a story out into the world without its coat buttoned and shoes tied a really exciting idea, because it gives so many more people the opportunity to dress it up in their own ways.<br />
Things are changing, and it&#8217;s great when you see &#8216;Eureka&#8217; moments happening in a newsroom. We just need to see more of them happening across all tiers of the editorial structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerekTut (Derek S. Tutschulte)</title>
		<link>http://www.story-review.com/2009/01/a-story-is-a-social-object/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>DerekTut (Derek S. Tutschulte)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.story-review.com/?p=121#comment-149</guid>
		<description>A story is a social object http://www.story-review.com/?p=121</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A story is a social object <a href="http://www.story-review.com/?p=121" rel="nofollow">http://www.story-review.com/?p=121</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
